Having a good grasp of the legal boundaries pertaining to
the entertainment industry is the most important aspect of the business. To cover you is the name of the game. Thus, knowing about Intellectual Property
protection (trademark, copyright, trade secrets, and patents) avoids another
from stealing ideas and material that originated from you and your
company. On the flip side understanding
the legal parameters of IP affords you the comfort of not being blind-sided or being on the brunt of a costly lawsuit. The
following cases: Rights of Publicity, Trademark and Copyright Infringement,
Trade Secrets, misrepresentation, and a lawsuit against Justin Bieber, give
examples of IP violations and lawsuits summarized by Gordon P. Firemark, Esq. and Tamara Bennet, Esq. of
entertainlawupdate.com from episodes 33 and 47.
Rights of Publicity – The right to control the commercial use
of one’s identity. Facebook faced a class
action suit with three individuals, one being a minor. Whenever someone likes (selects the thumbs up
sign) his or her picture appears next to it as an endorsement of the
brand. Facebook did not have mechanisms
in place to ask for permission prior to publishing the photos. Facebook settled for millions most of which
went to the attorneys.
Denver Post reported that a conservative political party
claimed fair use, when the group used a copy of a gay couple
kissing at their wedding. The political
party made a copy of the picture changed the background printed it on flyers and mailed
out to recipients in Colorado to make a political statement. The fair use presents a defense against
violations for the use of others’ copyrighted material without asking
permission because of their belief of fair use.
There has not been a lawsuit filed.
Trademark – An artist filed an infringement suit against the
Baltimore Ravens football team for their use of a design of a bee logo. The artist designed a very
similar logo for the Maryland Stadium Authority. The 4th Circuit Court concluded
the Ravens use the logo for factual content and not expressive content. According to entertainmentlaw.com, had the
artist used the logo as a trademark perhaps he would have the right to claim
copyright infringement. The court ruled
in favor of the Baltimore Ravens.
Copyright – Jack Daniels the liquor company sent a Cease and
Desist letter to an author for copyright infringement of their label. The author’s book cover closely resembled the
Jack Daniels label. The company offered
partial cost to replace the book cover.
The civility of the Cease and Desist letter of Jack Daniels company is
unprecedented, a normal Cease and Desist letter is scary and nasty.
Trade Secrets – A very important lesson learned for the creator
of the famous Tommy Lee, of the Motley Crew band, drum loop coaster. The creator of this design wanted
compensation, however, there were no documents in place stating that he was to
receive compensation for the design, therefore, he could not claim that the
idea was a trade secret that had been violated.
No compensation was awarded to designer.
Misrepresentation – In Blancarte vs. Solis, according to the
Talent Agency Act of California only a licensed talent agent can negotiate
talent contracts. An entertainment
lawyer, Blancarte negotiated a contract of a sportscaster, Solis claimed that
the lawyer misrepresented himself and, therefore, not entitled to the fee. The Labor Commission concurred based on the
Talent Agency Act policy. Blancarte
continues to pursue the lawsuit in a higher court. This poses the question, if lawyers are able
to negotiate contracts of talent without being a licensed talent agent where
does that leave the talent agents in the negotiation process? Or what about the states that do not require
that a talent agent be licensed, would the Talent Agency Act policy apply
in those states?
Justin Bieber – A woman filed a lawsuit against Justin Bieber
for hearing impairments caused by the elevation of decibels exacerbated by loud
music and crowd yelling cued by Bieber throughout the concert. The woman is seeking $9 million in
damages. It is common practice for the
venue to take assumption of risks in consideration; for instance, having earplugs
on site or sound checks to ensure the sound does not exceed unhealthy limits.
In talent management, the above cases have the potential to
be commonplace against a company with the talent that they represent if proper and
thorough contracts are not in place.
This includes all contracts with talent, venders, independent
contractors, employees, etc. It is
imperative that one should not leave anything for assumptions; a
well-structured contract has no room for ambiguity.
No comments:
Post a Comment